Case desk online · response within 24h
Governance
Forensic findings are only useful if they survive scrutiny. This page describes the internal standards Bitaps applies when taking on a matter, verifying who we are acting for, and cooperating with exchanges, counsel and authorities. It describes our own procedures and is not a statement of licensing, certification or regulatory approval.
Last updated 24 August 2026
Before we act on your behalf with a third party — filing a freeze request, contacting an exchange, executing a bridge reclaim — we confirm who you are and that you have authority over the affected wallets or accounts. Depending on the matter that can involve:
Verification steps appear as requirements on the relevant stage of your case file.
We will not take on, and will withdraw from, work where:
During tracing we compare addresses against attribution, exchange and sanctioned-entity datasets. Screening results are indicative intelligence, not legal determinations: an address labelled as belonging to a service may be a deposit address, a shared wallet or misattributed. We state confidence levels in our reports and distinguish observed facts from inference.
We check new matters against existing engagements before accepting them. Where we identify a conflict — for example two clients with competing claims to the same recovered assets — we disclose it and either decline the second matter or proceed only with informed written consent and strict information barriers.
We prepare packages in the format investigators and compliance teams actually use, and we respond to lawful requests from competent authorities. We do not hand over your case file to a third party on request alone: disclosures are made where you authorise them or where the law compels us, and we tell you when that happens unless we are legally barred from doing so.
We do not take custody of client assets. Recovered funds are released by the custodian, court or bridge endpoint to a destination address you nominate and confirm, and each recovery is reconciled against the original loss in writing.
If you believe an engagement, analyst or finding falls short of these standards, write to support@bitaps.co or to Bitaps, Marken 6, Himmelev, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark. Concerns are reviewed independently of the analyst involved and answered in writing.
Questions about this document?
Write to support@bitaps.co or contact us at Marken 6, Himmelev, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark.
See also our legal & policy centre.